Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Low Water Bridges topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DuBarr County approves Motion 2537 to transfer funds for low‑water bridge covers
Summary
At a meeting of the DuBarr County governing body, officials approved Motion 2537 to transfer funds from an identified tax fund to pay for installation of property covers on low‑water bridges; the motion passed by affirmative voice votes from the present justices.
At a meeting of the DuBarr County governing body (date not specified), members approved Motion 2537 to transfer funds for installation of property covers on low‑water bridges.
The motion, entered on the record as “Mortgage number 2537” in the transcript, was described as a transfer from an “2003 additional low fuel tax form fund” to pay for installation of property covers on low‑water bridges throughout the county. The transcript does not specify who moved or seconded the motion.
Why it matters: The appropriation directs county funds toward infrastructure mitigation at low‑water bridge locations, which the transcript indicates is an intended countywide installation effort.
Details: The transcript line recorded the item as “Mortgage number 2537. This is to transfer inappropriate funds from 2,003 additional low fuel tax form fund for the payment of the installation of property covers on low water bridge throughout.” The transcript does not specify the total dollar amount, the exact bridges to be covered, a contractor, or an implementation schedule.
Discussion and vote: The record shows brief discussion prompts followed by roll‑call or voice affirmations. The transcript captures multiple justices replying “Yes.” Those identified on the record as answering in the sequence that followed the motion include Justice Hobson, Justice Johnson, Justice Reed, Justice Kirkwood, Justice Shipment, Justice Dorothy and Justice Van Heilkenberg. The transcript does not record any “No,” “Abstain,” or recusals for this motion; the motion was recorded as approved.
Limits and missing information: The transcript does not identify the precise source account name beyond the phrase above, the amount being transferred, or whether the work requires any outside approvals or contracting steps. The motion text and the approvals are recorded on the meeting transcript, but implementation details and funding totals were not specified during the item.
Next steps: The transcript contains no recorded directions to staff to publish a contract, provide a cost breakdown, or set an implementation timetable for the installations.
