Supervisors clarify travel-guide contract start date change will not extend termination
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
SubscribeSummary
A supervisor asked whether Resolution 291, which moves the travel-guide contract commencement date to Jan. 1, also pushes back the termination date; county staff said the termination date remains unchanged and the change was made to allow earlier publication of the travel guide.
Supervisor Patrick asked whether Resolution 291, which changes the commencement date of the county travel-guide contract to Jan. 1, would also extend the contract's termination date. A county staff member, identified in the transcript as Jared, told the board the change was made to allow the travel guide to be produced earlier: "Basically, we wanna get the the travel guide out earlier on. So in order to do that, we just needed to back up the contract date from May to January," Jared said. Jared confirmed that the change "doesn't change the termination date." The transcript also notes the travel-guide contract amount as $155,000. The exchange matters for procurement timing: moving the contract commencement date was described as a scheduling adjustment to support earlier publication, not a contract extension. The transcript does not show a recorded vote on Resolution 291 in the provided excerpt. No additional contract terms or revised termination dates were presented in the meeting excerpt.
