Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Competency Restoration Costs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee questions rising competency-restoration costs, approves $500,000 transfer
Summary
Warren County Health Services Committee discussed rising costs for competency restoration under CPL 730, heard concerns about lack of local control and transparency, and approved a $500,000 transfer from fund balance to cover expected expenses for the year.
Warren County Health Services Committee members on Thursday discussed mounting costs tied to competency-to-stand-trial proceedings under CPL 730 and approved a request to transfer $500,000 from the county’s fund balance to cover the remainder of the year’s expenses. Rob presented the quarterly CPL 730 competency expenses report and said the county is approaching its annual budget for those costs.
The discussion matters because counties in New York now pay the full facility cost for restoration stays that are ordered under CPL 730, and committee members said they have limited ability to control how long people remain in state restoration facilities. Rob told the committee the department paid about $304,077 in the first quarter and roughly $219,531 in the second quarter and that the department budgeted $600,000 for the year; he requested a $500,000 transfer from the fund balance to cover expected costs.
Committee members repeatedly flagged two concerns: (1) clinical decisions about competency and length of stay are made by state experts and courts, limiting county control; and (2) transparency around how facilities bill counties is inadequate. Supervisor Wilde said, “These are all state employees that are doing the chargeback expenses. We don’t have any control over this.” Manager Kaplan and Treasurer Norton described legislative and intergovernmental efforts to get more clarity; Treasurer Norton said the county had been working through NYSAC and had sent a letter to the New York State Comptroller seeking visibility into the charges.
Speakers described legal and procedural limits on county authority. Committee members and staff repeatedly referenced CPL 730 as the statutory route for competency evaluations and noted a related court procedure sometimes called “Jackson relief” for cases where a person may be deemed unrestorable. Attorney Ulman and other staff said questions about who has standing to file a Jackson relief petition and what standards apply remain matters for legal review, and the committee directed staff to pursue work-group discussions with the public defender and county attorney to identify local options.
After discussion, the committee voted to bring the transfer request to the floor and approved the $500,000 transfer from fund balance. The action is intended to cover projected CPL 730-related chargebacks and exam costs through the fiscal year; committee members said they would continue to seek state-level changes and local transparency measures.
The committee also requested additional follow-up, including convening a local work group with the public defender and county attorney to explore outpatient restoration options, standing for Jackson relief petitions, and other measures to reduce inpatient restoration days.
Less critical details: staff noted some individuals have stayed in restoration facilities for extended periods (including more than a year in at least one case discussed), and the county will pursue further inquiries with the state and judicial stakeholders about reporting and billing practices.
