Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Trails And Open Space topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County awards $100,000 in municipal trails grants and $400,000 for farmland and open-space preservation; Graphite Range stewardship formalized

5807020 · September 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Saratoga County approved 2025 municipal trails grants totaling $100,000 across 14 municipalities, approved $400,000 in farmland and open-space preservation grants to preserve 349 acres, and authorized stewardship and parcel-addition agreements with Saratoga Plan Inc. for the Graphite Range Community Forest.

On Sept. 10, Saratoga County supervisors approved a package of trails, farmland and open-space actions, including municipal trails grants, farmland/open-space preservation grants and agreements for stewardship of the Graphite Range Community Forest. The 2025 municipal trails grant program awards $100,000 to 14 municipalities; the grants were presented as leveraging $513,814 in combined project costs across the municipalities. The county approved funding two farmland and one open-space preservation projects totaling $400,000 to preserve a combined 349 acres in the towns of Boston, Galway and Milton. Supervisors authorized a professional services stewardship agreement with Saratoga Plan Inc. to provide day-to-day management and stewardship of the Graphite Range Community Forest for a two-year term at $25,000 per year. The committee also approved a memorandum of agreement adding the Northern Gateway parcels to the Graphite Range Community Forest project and allowed a sewer easement conveyance over county land in Clifton Park to connect a residence to an existing manhole along the Zim Smith Trail. Discussion vs. decision: actions approving grants, stewardship and easement conveyance were formal decisions taken by the committee. Staff framed the grants as leveraging larger project costs; no public controversy or dissent was recorded in the meeting transcript.