During citizens communications, a resident urged the council to enforce neighborhood restrictions and the city’s previous determinations regarding a business operating at 207 Blanco (referred to in public comment as “Weed Botanicals”), saying the operation is causing traffic, large delivery trucks and parking impacts in a residential area. The speaker said the property is subject to an HLA (Home/Lot Agreement) or similar neighborhood restriction and that the city had earlier acted to stop the business; he said recent state legislation (HB 2464) that expanded no‑impact home‑based business definitions may affect enforcement but should not defeat neighborhood protections.Public comment asked whether the city had inspected the property for chemicals and presses, raised concerns about palletized deliveries and daily employee parking in front of homes, and requested the council stand by earlier enforcement. The council did not take formal action at the meeting on this comment during citizens communications. Staff follow‑up was implied by the speaker’s request.Nut graf: A resident requested that the city assert previously expressed restrictions and enforcement against a business operating within a residential neighborhood, noting traffic, delivery and potential safety concerns; the council did not act on the comment during the meeting but the matter was raised for staff follow‑up. Ending: The comment was entered into the record; any enforcement action would require staff investigation and legal review of the property’s status and state law implications.