Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Safe Streets Demo topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Shorewood presents Safe Streets demonstration report; temporary traffic-calming tools reduced speeds in tests
Summary
A village presentation summarized results from temporary traffic-calming demonstrations funded by a Safe Streets and Roads for All grant: traffic circles, curb extensions and a speed table produced measurable speed reductions and mixed public feedback; staff recommends further evaluation and a possible traffic-calming program.
Get email alerts on the Safe Streets Demo topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Village staff and consultants presented the final report on Shorewood’s Safe Streets and Roads for All demonstration project, which installed temporary traffic-calming measures — traffic circles, curb extensions and a speed table — in multiple neighborhoods under a federal grant.
The demonstration, funded with a $50,000 grant and a local $10,000 match, placed two temporary traffic circles, curb extensions in visibility-challenged crosswalks and one speed table. Staff reported installation by Public Works, engineering monitoring, and a 541-response community survey. Speeds and vehicle counts were measured with counters before and after installations.
Data showed modest but measurable reductions in 50th- and 85th-percentile speeds at traffic circle and speed-table locations and reduced rates of noncompliance with posted speed limits. The curb extensions were designed to improve pedestrian sight lines; staff demonstrated that pedestrian visibility increased when extensions were in place.
Public feedback was mixed: 56% of respondents found traffic circles effective, 43% found curb extensions effective, and 60% found the speed table effective; many respondents asked for clearer education, enforcement, and improved aesthetics for permanent installations. The majority of survey respondents (65%) supported pursuing additional temporary or permanent traffic-calming demonstrations.
Staff recommended using the findings to inform a forthcoming Safe Streets action plan, to pursue a traffic-calming request program and to prioritize permanent solutions in locations where demonstrations showed benefit. The village owns the demonstration equipment and staff noted follow-up steps to remove temporary items, evaluate equipment condition, and consider permanent designs where warranted.
Why it matters: The demonstration provides measured evidence of effectiveness for several types of traffic-calming tools, gives staff data to prioritize investments, and frames community outreach and funding questions for future projects.
Next steps: Consultants will finish the Safe Streets action plan; staff will remove remaining demonstrations and consider a traffic-calming program, funding sources and potential permanent installations as part of future capital planning.

