Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Registration Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Staff say online rec-card system impractical; proposing player-fee model for leagues

5793914 · August 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members discussed moving away from physical recreation cards for league players toward a single player-fee model to simplify accounting and reduce administrative burden; staff said they will continue examining how other cities handle online rec cards.

A board member asked whether the city could offer rec cards online; staff said the department is exploring options but is leaning toward eliminating physical rec cards for organized leagues and instead charging a single player fee per season.

"We actually have been working on eliminating the rec card and just going with a player fee so that you don't have to go get a physical card," Chip said, explaining that physical cards create administrative burdens: expiration dates that fall midseason, address mismatches that change residency classification and time-consuming accounting when a league pays a single check that must be applied to many individual accounts.

Under the proposed approach, Chip said, leagues would submit rosters and the department would validate residency for billing; the league would pay a consolidated fee (for example, a $1,000 league fee) rather than individual rec-card transactions. Staff said the change would reduce transactional work and simplify accounting.

Board members noted the city of Largo had pursued online rec-card models; staff said John had consulted with a Largo representative about their approach but cautioned geographic/residency verification is a challenge when registrations are completed remotely. Staff said they will continue to evaluate options and work with league partners before implementing a permanent change.

No formal policy decision was made at the meeting; the discussion was an informational briefing and staff said next steps include continued evaluation with league stakeholders.