The Historic Preservation Board on Sept. 4 reviewed a design package for 103 Second Avenue and confirmed the proposal generally meets the city’s design criteria for converting a contributing one-story house into an elevated living level above a converted ground floor used for parking and storage.

The review is consequential because the homeowner seeks to preserve the existing structure’s footprint and character while raising the living level to comply with FEMA elevation requirements; doing so can affect whether the house retains its historic integrity for future designation or incentives.

Brandon Berry, staff, explained the application uses a design-review pathway that allows a converted ground floor with a re-established living level above the same footprint. The project keeps original materials—coquina-style siding on the lower converted level—and proposes horizontal lap siding and compatible window patterns on the new second story. The roof material will change from concrete tile to standing-seam metal; porch posts will change from original metal columns to aluminum for perceived structural reasons. Staff noted the conversion is likely to reduce the building’s historic integrity as a contributing resource but found the design compatible with district massing and materials.

Contractor Kyle (Cal) Webster and owner Kimberly Turner described the design choices as efforts to preserve the property’s “traditional coastal vibe,” to retain surviving landscaping where possible, and to make the home more resilient; Turner said the family preferred elevation in place rather than full demolition. Board members asked about the porch columns and roof material; the applicant confirmed the changes were driven by durability and structural considerations. Members expressed general support for the design and for the owners’ efforts to retain original character while meeting FEMA requirements.

Staff advised that retaining the structure in this converted form could affect future eligibility for some historic-incentive programs should they be established, because the permanent conversion can reduce the building’s historic integrity. The board offered guidance but did not need to take a formal vote on this informational design review; staff advised the applicants to proceed with permit submittal and to consult the city on final materials and construction details.