Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Signage topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission approves Culver's shared monument sign on Gender Road

5793699 · September 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Canal Winchester Planning and Zoning Commission on Sept. 8 approved a variance to allow a multi-tenant monument sign for a new Culver's and an adjacent outparcel on Gender Road, with conditions on color and limits to other monument signs on the two parcels.

The Canal Winchester Planning and Zoning Commission on Sept. 8 approved Variance VA-25-009 to allow a multi-tenant, off-premise monument sign serving a Culver’s restaurant at 6480 Gender Road and a vacant 1.62-acre outparcel fronting Gender Road.

The variance permits a 10-foot-tall, 6-foot-wide sign with a display area under 48 square feet to sit on the 1.62-acre outparcel so the Culver’s location has frontage visibility on Gender Road. The commission approved the variance with two staff conditions: (1) no additional monument sign may be installed on either the 3.11-acre Culver’s parcel or the 1.62-acre outparcel, and (2) the monument sign must be constructed with a neutral background color (white, tan or gray).

Staff planner Andrew Moore told the commission the subject property consists of two parcels created from a 4.7-acre flag-lot split and that the sign code would otherwise push the sign location away from Gender Road. Moore said staff had suggested a variance to allow the shared monument sign to reduce total signage along Gender Road.

Trey Watts of Springfield Sign, representing Culver’s franchising, said the applicant is comfortable with a shared sign and with changing the proposed Culver’s-blue background to a neutral tone to make a future tenant panel blend. Watts said the tenant panel would be blank for now and that internal wiring would be installed so a future tenant could use an opaque face with push-through acrylic lettering to match the main sign.

The commission voted unanimously to approve the variance. Roll-call votes recorded the following positions: Donahue — yes; McDonald — yes; Palsgrove — yes; Ritchie — yes; Wildenthal — yes; Deeds — yes.

Because the sign meets the city’s size and complex-identification sign standards and the applicant agreed to the staff conditions, the commission described the change as allowing shared, multi-tenant signage rather than an additional freestanding sign on either parcel.