Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning R2 R3 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oviedo schedules public hearing on rezoning 3.8-acre site to allow 22 duplex units
Summary
Council scheduled a Sept. 15 public hearing for Ordinance 17-59, which would change zoning from R2 to R3 on roughly 3.8 acres, enabling the developer to build 22 units (11 duplexes) on a single lot rather than subdividing.
The Oviedo City Council voted Aug. 18 to schedule a public hearing Sept. 15 on Ordinance 17-59, a first-reading rezoning request to change about 3.8 acres from R2 to R3 to permit a developer to build 22 residential units as duplexes on a single tract.
City planning staff told council the property's future land use designation remains medium-density residential and that the maximum allowed density under that designation is unchanged: 30 dwelling units. Staff said the applicant proposes 22 units, which is fewer than the future-land-use maximum and reduces projected traffic and utility impacts compared with the maximum allowable buildout.
Planning staff explained the practical difference between R2 and R3: R2 anticipates subdivision into individually platted lots (each duplex on its own lot), while R3 allows consolidation of multiple units on a single tract (multifamily-style development). Under R2, multifamily development is not permitted; under R3 it is. Council questions focused on whether rezoning would allow higher density in the future and whether there are binding mechanisms to restrict the developer to 22 units.
Staff and the city attorney said the rezoning does not change the future land-use density cap (30 units). The council was advised that conventional zoning (R3) does not include a development agreement binding the developer to the proposed 22 units; a planned-unit development (PUD) with a development agreement would be required to impose legally binding, project-specific limits.
Council discussed tradeoffs: the applicant prefers not to subdivide and instead own and operate all units on a single lot; staff said either path (subdivision under R2 or consolidated development under R3) would incur application costs and different permitting steps. Councilmember Ott asked whether future owners could increase unit counts; staff replied that zoning/conventional procedures would still be limited by the future-land-use maximum but could permit up to 30 units.
With no members of the public speaking on the item, council voted to schedule the ordinance for a Sept. 15 public hearing. Staff said the local planning agency recommended adoption and that staff will be available for questions at the hearing.
