Resident asks county to explain new "recreational" trash fee for river/camp lots

5793586 · August 15, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At public comment Christie Thompson said she and other weekend users of a river/camp lot were billed a new "recreational" trash fee this year without notice and asked the county for detailed criteria showing how such lots are assessed.

During the public‑comment period at the Grayson County Board of Supervisors' August meeting, resident Christie Thompson asked the board to explain why a new "recreational" trash fee has been assessed on her river lot and how the county determines which properties receive the charge.

"We have never been charged a recreational trash fee until this year, and we were not made aware that there would be a recreational trash fee," Thompson said. She told the board the lot lacks water and electricity and is used as a weekend camper site; she said she has never seen a trash truck stop there and that the schedule (if pickup is on Thursday) would leave trash sitting all weekend, attracting wildlife.

Thompson asked for a detailed explanation of the criteria used to classify a lot as "recreational" and whether similar creek or riverside lots with campers would receive the same assessment. She said she received notice that unpaid fees could result in a warrant and asked the board how the county could charge for a service she says is not provided.

A county official suggested Thompson follow up with county administration and named a staff member, Steve, as a contact to get more information. No countywide policy change or board action was recorded during the meeting; the comments were part of the public comment period.

Next steps: Thompson was told she could follow up with county administration during business hours; the record shows no formal board response or vote on trash fee criteria at the meeting.