Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council advances first reading of ordinance to ban roosters in city limits
Summary
The City Council held a first reading of an ordinance amendment that would prohibit roosters inside city limits; the ordinance proceeds to a second reading after initial debate about grandfathering and timelines for compliance.
Council members held first reading of an ordinance amendment that would prohibit keeping roosters within the city limits, citing repeated noise complaints. Staff and councilors discussed whether existing roosters should be grandfathered and how much compliance time to allow.
City staff said the proposed language would allow the city to order mitigation and, ultimately, penalties for a rooster determined to be a nuisance; the draft does not explicitly grandfather roosters and would allow enforcement after the ordinance stage and a subsequent hearing process. Councilors asked for clarity about timelines (the ordinance as drafted provides a period before fines commence) and for broad public notice so residents raising chicks that may later develop into roosters have time to plan.
Council members directed staff to bring the ordinance back for a second reading with clarifications about compliance timelines and public notice; no final vote was taken at first reading.
Why it matters: Rooster noise is cited by multiple residents as an ongoing nuisance in dense residential areas; the ordinance aims to give the city an enforceable standard while staff will refine timing and notice provisions.
What’s next: Staff to return the ordinance for second reading with clarified compliance language and a public-notice plan.
