Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Fire Training topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County fire training facility faces roughly $400,000 shortfall after site bids exceed budget
Summary
County staff and volunteer leaders told the Board of Supervisors that low construction bids and higher-than-expected site work costs have left the planned fire training facility about $400,000 short of funds previously estimated; the board discussed options but took no formal vote.
The Board of Supervisors discussed a shortfall of roughly $400,000 for a planned county fire training facility after site-work bids returned significantly higher than budget estimates.
County staff told the board that the grant for the project covers the structure only and that the county had already allocated local matching funds. “450,000 is the grant. You can only use the grant towards the structure cost,” a county staff member said during the presentation. The staff member said the most recent site-work bid was nearly $260,000 above the amount that had been budgeted for that element of the project and that the structure estimate from two years ago was about $652,000, leaving a notable gap when combined with the site-work overrun.
Volunteer leaders and fire-training committee members urged the board to preserve the project’s scope if feasible. Former Chief Brent, who serves on the fire training committee, said having a local burn/training facility keeps experienced personnel and apparatus in the county during training rather than sending them to neighboring jurisdictions. Jeff Potter, chair of the volunteer fire/rescue association (FRA), also participated in committee discussions.
County staff outlined three principal paths: reduce the structure concept (for example, by changing from the current five-container design), identify site-cost savings (including volunteer labor for some clearing work), or provide additional county funding. Staff estimated the additional county contribution at about $378,222 and later described the figure as “closer to at least $400,000.” A supervisor asked whether that additional sum would be due this fiscal year; staff replied the additional funding would likely be needed by the end of the current fiscal year.
Board members debated timing and risk. One supervisor said delaying to rebid work could save money but risked higher overall cost and further delay; another cautioned that approving more money now could require additional requests later if bids continue to shift. The board discussed options for offsetting the needed amount in the capital improvements program (CIP) if the grant window is missed.
No formal motion or vote was taken at the meeting. Staff said that ordering containers has a lead time of about 26 weeks and that ordering sooner could reduce the risk of missing the grant timeline, but that site-work bids must be reconciled before committing to full procurement. The fire-training committee said it is revisiting the design and looking for cost reductions.
Why this matters: county leaders said a local training facility reduces cross-jurisdictional travel for realistic live-burn and skills training and keeps more experienced personnel available locally. The board will need to decide whether to allocate additional local funds, revise the facility design, or attempt alternate procurement to close the funding gap.
Looking ahead: staff and volunteer leaders will continue to evaluate design changes and cost-saving measures; the board signaled willingness to discuss additional funding but asked staff for clearer, updated estimates before any appropriation.
(Reporting note: Direct quotes and attributions are drawn from meeting remarks by county staff and fire-training committee members recorded in the meeting transcript.)
