Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Student Mental Health topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District to consider $12,000 donation request to continue St. Luke’s YES student mental‑health program

5792542 · September 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

St. Luke’s YES program has provided on-site therapists for the district for multiple years using grant funding; district staff asked the board to consider a $12,000 donation this year to help cover unreimbursed services for uninsured students and to sustain the program if grant funding is reduced.

District finance staff told the board that St. Luke’s YES (Your Emotional Strength Support) program has provided on-site therapy and assessments to Pleasant Valley students since the 2022–23 school year and has seen thousands of students across the IU during that period. During the three historical years cited, Pleasant Valley did not contribute financially while the program was grant-funded.

St. Luke’s staff informed districts that some of the COVID‑era grants that funded the work have ended and that St. Luke’s now requests a local donation to sustain the district‑site services. District staff said local districts in the intermediate unit had negotiated differing donation amounts with St. Luke’s; the range cited in the discussion was approximately $10,000 to $25,000 per district. The district asked the board to put a $12,000 donation item on the next board meeting agenda for approval; staff said the $12,000 equates to roughly $6 per student when averaged across recent service numbers.

Staff clarified that St. Luke’s will continue to provide services in the district regardless of the donation; the requested money would be used to cover charges that are not billable to a student’s insurance or to fund services for uninsured families. Board members asked whether St. Luke’s provides de‑identified accounting of insurance‑billing vs. district‑covered services; staff said that data had not been provided to the district during the presentation. Several board members expressed support for the program and for placing the donation on the regular agenda for a public vote; one board member stated financial reservations and noted they would prefer to rely on state grant allocations if available. No final vote was taken at the working session.