Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meeting Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chicopee rules committee authorizes law department reply to open‑meeting complaints about minutes
Summary
The Chicopee City Rules Committee voted to allow the law department to send formal responses to multiple open‑meeting‑law complaints alleging missing documents and roll‑call votes from March council meetings; the law department said no violations occurred.
The Chicopee City Rules Committee on June 11 voted to allow the city law department to issue formal responses to multiple open‑meeting‑law complaints alleging deficiencies in city council meeting minutes.
The complaints, filed in April, accused the council of failing to list documents used during deliberations and of not recording roll‑call votes in minutes for March meetings. The committee reviewed a draft response from the law department and approved sending the response onward as the next step in the complaint process.
The questions concern complaints filed by Patrick Higgins on April 7, 2025, about the March 4, 2025, special meeting minutes, and by Derek Dobas in April 2025 regarding the March 31 and March 10, 2025, meetings. In public comment, resident Lisa Manbino of 34 Everett Street urged the committee to make the specifics public: "It would be nice if you guys actually discussed what it is." She said members of the public should be able to see the documents underlying council actions.
Shane Brooks, counsel to the committee, read the law department's draft response, which says the council addressed the complaints and that the city ‘‘reviewed the minutes’’ and concluded that documents referenced in deliberations were not used and therefore were not required to be listed in the minutes. Brooks told the committee that the council determined two submitted documents were privileged and that a third, which the complainant said he had written himself, had been forwarded to councilors by email. "Letters received from the public are not required to become part of the record at a city council meeting," Brooks said.
Brooks also told the rules committee that the full Chicopee City Council met on June 17 and authorized issuance of the formal response. He said the response would be sent to the complainants and to the Massachusetts Attorney General's Office and that the city would attach the March 10 meeting minutes where relevant.
After brief public comment and discussion, committee members voted by roll call to permit the law department to issue the response. The committee chair then circulated the response for signatures, as required before final transmission.
The meeting record shows members of the public raising a broader concern: that council minutes rarely list supporting documents even when materials are used in deliberations. Commenters said that practice complicates public oversight and asked the city to clarify how packets and supporting materials are handled.
Next steps announced at the meeting were: the law department will finalize and send the response to the complainants and the Attorney General's Office, with the indicated attachments; the rules committee will circulate the response for council signatures; and any further action will follow from the Attorney General's review or subsequent council direction.
