Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sign Compliance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Church of God agrees to fix electronic sign; zoning committee sets August check‑in

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Church of God at 993 Chicopee Street told the zoning committee it has been working with the sign manufacturer to slow scrolling, dim brightness and eliminate rapid transitions. The committee agreed to postpone enforcement to Aug. 27, 2025, pending the church—ollowing up with the building inspector and seeking final sign approval.

Pastor Edrick Floyd and members of the Church of God told the Chicopee City Zoning Committee on April 30 that they have been troubleshooting an electronic sign at their 993 Chicopee Street property and that they are working with the manufacturer and volunteers to resolve brightness and speed settings.

The committee heard that the sign had displayed faster scrolling and brighter messages than permitted, and that residents had raised concerns about the sign—ehavior and an absence of an eight‑second pause between message changes. The church representatives said they have located the manual, consulted a technical volunteer and planned a factory reset with the manufacturer; the church sought time to finish adjustments.

Committee members and church representatives described repeated efforts to slow the sign, remove flashing effects, and create a static or "page" display that would hold a single message before changing. Councilor Wagner offered to assist with technical expertise and committee members recommended coordination with the building inspector and the city IT contact as part of final sign checks.

The zoning committee voted to postpone action on the special permit and related compliance review until August 27, 2025, pending a written request from the applicant to extend the review. The committee asked the applicant to work with the building inspector so city staff could verify that the sign meets the city's special‑permit conditions and lighting/operation rules; Councilor Wagner said he would abstain from future votes if he assists with technical work.

Formal action: motion to postpone consideration of sign‑related compliance until the zoning meeting of Aug. 27, 2025, pending the applicant's written request; motion passed (Councilors Balakir, Shumski, Wagner voted yes).