Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics And Open Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Councilors raise concern about proposed Oregon Ethics Commission guidance; ask staff to coordinate response
Summary
Councilors expressed concern about proposed Oregon Government Ethics Commission (OGEC) guidance they said could limit routine communications and mentorship among public officials; staff will check with the League of Oregon Cities and explore a joint response or guidance.
Get email alerts on the Ethics And Open Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Several councilors raised concerns about guidance being considered by the Oregon Government Ethics Commission, saying it could restrict common lines of communication among elected officials and harm onboarding and mentoring for new councilors. One councilor said the guidance could “shut down a lot of really good work” and asked whether the council could submit comments or a letter to the commission. Staff said they would check with contacts at the League of Oregon Cities to see whether the league is coordinating a broader response and would report back. Legal counsel and staff were asked to clarify what forms of communication and mentoring remain permissible under the commission’s proposed interpretations. Discussion highlighted the practical effects on mentorship: a newly elected councilor said informal mentoring has been important for coming up to speed and asked that any response emphasize that concern. Staff committed to sharing the councilor’s written questions and legal answers broadly to the elected officials as soon as possible. What it means: No formal position was adopted, but councilors requested staff to coordinate with the League of Oregon Cities and provide legal clarification and the opportunity for council comment to the OGEC if appropriate.

