Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the County Property Leases topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County awards two one-year cash-rent farm leases at Catlin Park and Aetna Road

5788895 · September 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

LaSalle County awarded two single-year cash-rent leases for county-owned farmland: Catlin Park (approx. 119.44 acres) to Kevin Newell at $247.65 per acre and the Aetna Road parcel (approx. 15.41 acres) to Kevin Newell at $252.57 per acre, effective Jan. 1–Dec. 31, 2026. Committees reviewed two bids for each property and recommended the highest

LaSalle County Board members approved two one-year cash-rent farm leases at their Sept. 1 meeting, awarding both parcels to the highest responsible bidder, Kevin Newell of Mendota. The Catlin Park parcel (approximately 119.44 acres, PIN 22-29-301-000) was awarded at $247.65 per acre for the 2026 crop year (term effective Jan. 1–Dec. 31, 2026). The Aetna Road parcel (approximately 15.41 acres adjacent to the LaSalle County Governmental Complex, PIN 14-36-422-000) was awarded at $252.57 per acre for the same one-year term. County presenters said the property committee opened two bids for each lease on Aug. 22, 2025, and that property and finance committees recommended accepting the highest responsible bid. The Catlin Park parcel was described on the record as timbered and not typical cropland, which the board said explained the lower per-acre bid relative to typical cash-rent averages. Mister Aubrey asked who would monitor compliance with lease provisions such as soil sampling and crop-quality requirements; county staff said the board office would receive soil-sample results and that staff (Amanda, referenced on the record) would review them to ensure the lessee met conditions spelled out in the lease agreement. The board moved and seconded both resolutions; each was approved in voice vote after no further questions were raised on the floor.