Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emergency Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board members consider request to endorse emergency-management bill; staff to review before action
Summary
A speaker asked whether the county would endorse an emergency-management bill that would provide upfront funds instead of post-event reimbursement; board members said they have previously sent letters of support for grants but would review the bill before deciding on a formal endorsement.
During public comment, a participant asked whether the County Board would sign a suggested letter endorsing an emergency-management bill that has cleared committee and is seeking local endorsements. The participant said the bill, as understood, “would grant the money upfront,” reducing county liability compared with the current system of reimbursement after expenses. Board members noted the county sometimes provides letters of support for grant applications and that other counties have adopted resolutions supporting legislative measures; one board member said, “We belong to both NACO and UCCI,” and that NACO was asking counties to consider endorsement. Board members agreed they would need to review the bill text and that staff could present a resolution or letter to the full board if desired. A board member asked about the health of Pam, who had been expected to be consulted; another board member said Pam remained in the hospital. No vote or formal action was taken at this meeting to endorse the bill or sign a county-level letter of support; board members asked staff to look into the proposal and the appropriate mechanism (letter of support vs. resolution) before any formal endorsement.
