Committee reprioritizes capital projects to cover urgent jail plumbing and courtroom HVAC repairs

5787288 · August 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The administration committee approved a capital-projects update that shifts existing capital funds (no net budget increase) to address failed jail plumbing that caused flooding and a failed courtroom HVAC unit; staff said they found efficiencies elsewhere to cover the work.

The committee approved an update to the county capital projects list on Aug. 15 that reallocates existing capital funds to address two urgent building repairs: failed prison/jail plumbing that has caused flooding and a failed courtroom-and-chamber HVAC system.

Executive Director Roger Fonstock told the committee the change is “not a change to our overall capital budget. We are reprioritizing, and we found some efficiencies.” He said the repairs are time sensitive: plumbing work was underway to stop flooding, and HVAC replacement will require a larger project for which funds must be identified.

Why it matters: The repairs affect core county facilities (a jail and court chambers). Staff said reallocations were chosen to avoid increasing the overall capital budget; members were notified of the account changes and the projects that drove the reprioritization.

Details and funding: Fonstock said the capital update lists multiple changes; two items “drive” the adjustments: failed plumbing in the jail that caused flooding, and a failed HVAC in a courtroom and chamber. He noted the HVAC replacement “is going to be a larger project” and the current recoding will allow interim repairs and planning for the full replacement. He also pointed to a furniture item in the development department tied to the capital update and clarified that the capital portion paying $95,067 would be balanced by a development fund (related to housing and urban development) paying the remainder.

Committee discussion focused on whether items were clearly tied to line entries and how funding splits were accounted for. Fonstock pointed members to slides and packet pages for the cost breakdown and said the department will continue to track capital allocations regularly.

Outcome and follow-up: The committee approved the capital-projects resolution (TMP25-977). Fonstock said the county will continue to assess year-end capital projects to determine rollovers into 2026 and will present options about contributing $2 million (or other amounts suggested) to the capital plan for future years.

Ending: Staff said they will provide updated capital plans showing a scenario with no new county capital contributions and alternative scenarios that include proposed capital infusions so the committee can set policy direction.