Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Development Ordinances topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee moves three Over-the-Rhine ordinances to passage: Findlay Community Center, Crossroad Health Center and Goose Alley vacation

5779407 · April 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee advanced three ordinances related to Over-the-Rhine development: a funding and development agreement and bond appropriation for the Findlay Community Center, a funding and development agreement and appropriation for Christian Community Health Services (Crossroad Health Center), and an ordinance to vacate 0.0759 acres of Goose Alley.

The committee briefly considered and put on for passage three ordinances tied to development in Over-the-Rhine.

Item 1 would authorize a funding and development agreement with 3CDC through OTR Holdings Inc. for the Findlay Community Center, establish a capital project account and transfer and appropriate bond proceeds totaling, as recorded in the meeting, "24, point $2.05 million dollars." The ordinance also declares the project serves a public purpose.

Item 2 authorizes a funding and development agreement between the city and 3CDC (OTR Holdings) to support Christian Community Health Services (referred to in the presentation as the Crossroad Health Center). The ordinance would establish a capital project account and transfer and appropriate $3,167,464 in bond proceeds to support the project and declares a public purpose.

Item 3 would vacate 0.0759 acres (a portion of Goose Alley) in Over-the-Rhine to be incorporated into the project footprint.

Committee procedure: the solicitor presented each item and the chair announced all three would be put on for passage. At the conclusion of the meeting, Council Member Owens asked to be recorded as a “yes” for items 1, 2 and 3; no complete roll-call tally was recorded in the transcript.

Ending: The ordinances were advanced for passage with minimal debate; council members and staff indicated subject-area staff (director Carter and Kujers) were available for questions on technical matters.