Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Survey shows majority support for Gonzales fire department parcel tax before cost details

August 19, 2025 | Gonzales City, Monterey County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Survey shows majority support for Gonzales fire department parcel tax before cost details
David Flaherty, head of Magellan Strategies, presented results of a June–July poll measuring local voters’ appetite for a potential parcel tax to fund Gonzales fire and emergency services.
Lede: A local survey presented Aug. 18 found 64% of registered voters in Gonzales would approve a proposed parcel tax to support the city’s fire and emergency services in an initial, uninformed ballot test; support rose after respondents read explanatory information about staffing and service impacts.
Nut graf: The presentation to the Gonzales City Council was an informational briefing — not a proposal vote — summarizing a 133-voter survey Magellan conducted June 18–July 6 (margin of error ±8.36%). The poll measured perceived fire risk, department approval, fiscal responsibility and reactions to exact ballot language the city might place before voters in June 2026.
Body: Flaherty told the council the firm tested baseline items first. “Half of the residents say definitely increased [fire risk], only 7% decreased, and 41% about the same,” he said, arguing that perceived increased risk can make voters more receptive to a measure. He reported a job approval rating of about 90% for the Gonzales Fire Department and said two-thirds “strongly approve.”
On a general, nonspecific question about a fire tax, Flaherty said “7 out of 10 voters say yes.” When respondents read the exact proposed ballot language — described in the presentation as an annual parcel tax that included dollar figures for single-family and multi-unit homes and a per-square-foot nonresidential charge — 64% said they would approve in the uninformed test and 24% said they would reject it; 12% were undecided.
Flaherty said the firm then provided factual background (examples: two firefighters on duty at a time, a 35% increase in 911 calls over 20 years, nearest emergency room roughly 20 minutes away) and re-tested support. "Support increased by 7 points and opposition declined by 6 points," he said, reporting that the “definitely yes” cohort rose to roughly 39% after education.
Council members asked no formal questions about placing a measure on the ballot during the presentation. Mayor Jose Rios and other council members expressed support for public education about the connection between local fire staffing and homeowner insurance reductions; Council Member Silva said she would “share the message whenever and whenever I can.”
Ending: The presentation concluded as an informational item; no motion was taken. Council and staff will need to decide later whether to refine ballot language, pursue formal place-on-ballot actions and develop an outreach plan if they choose to proceed.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal