Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parole Revocation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parole revoked for Kim Farrell Rose after multiple alleged post‑release incidents
Summary
The committee revoked parole for Kim Farrell Rose, citing a series of alleged criminal incidents while on supervision, including trespass and burglary reports and ongoing drug‑use concerns.
The Committee on Parole revoked parole for Kim Farrell Rose (listed as Kim Farrell Ross in the record) at an East Baton Rouge hearing on Sept. 9, 2025, citing continued criminal activity alleged after her release and evidence that she returned to drug use.
Board members reviewed three separate incident tracks: an aggravated‑burglary/assault allegation later reduced to a trespass‑type charge, a September 2022 simple burglary allegation for which a status conference remains pending, and a pattern of homelessness and missed supervision payments. Rose told the panel she was homeless and using drugs at the time of some incidents, and that some charges had been reduced; she said one case was scheduled for a court date in November and another had been reduced to a misdemeanor.
The nut graf: the panel’s review focused on whether Rose’s post‑release conduct demonstrated ongoing criminal behavior and risk to the community. Board members concluded the allegations and supporting reports merited revocation to allow court matters to be resolved and to address ongoing supervision and treatment needs.
Rose said she had medical issues (an above‑knee amputation) and that she had lost housing; she said she had been on drugs at the time of the incidents but was participating in rehabilitation since detention. The board noted outstanding supervision fees and the fact Rose had been in custody about three years on the pending matters.
Outcome: the parole committee voted to revoke parole. Members said the revocation would allow resolution of pending criminal charges and recommended treatment and stabilization in custody before any reconsideration.
Procedural note: board members moved into executive session to review records before rendering a final vote; the panel returned and recorded a unanimous decision to revoke.
