Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ditch Reconstruction topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves change order for Nesbajani Ditch reconstruction; contractor seeks $94,514 and time extension

5775121 · September 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The County Drainage Board approved a change order for the Nesbajani Ditch reconstruction that adds work requested near Fillmore, with the contractor asking for $94,514 and a time extension; approval was contingent on redevelopment commission sign‑off.

The County Drainage Board on Thursday approved a change order for the Nesbajani Ditch reconstruction that adds grading and bank‑height work and includes a contractor request for $94,514 and a time extension reported in the meeting record. The change order covers new work north and south of Fillmore: grading revisions north of State Road 2 to raise bank heights based on hydraulic modeling and revisions requested by “GM,” and a plan to use excavated material south of Fillmore to abandon and fill the existing ditch rather than spreading it on the floodplain north of Fillmore. The contractor requested $94,514 and a time extension described in the record as “7 to 5 days.” The presenter said portions of the work have been completed — specifically the raised bank heights north of State Road 2 and along GM’s outfall — but that other elements remain unfinished. The record notes these added tasks were not part of the original contract and therefore are being handled as a change order. The board approved the change order with the condition that the county’s redevelopment commission also approve the work; the presenter said that redevelopment commission action is scheduled for Sept. 16. The record also notes documents in the packet require Mr. Dieter’s signature. Why it matters: the change responds to hydraulic modeling and partner requests that altered the project scope after construction began, increasing cost and schedule risk for a public drainage project. The board’s contingent approval moves the contract amendment forward but ties final implementation to the redevelopment commission’s upcoming vote. Next steps: the change order will proceed if redevelopment commission approval is obtained; the record shows remaining work and the contractor’s payment request will be reconciled as the change order is completed.