Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Minor Subdivisions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Plan commission reviews two minor subdivisions including 'Logos Hill'; staff recommends primary approvals
Summary
Two separate minor‑subdivision petitions—one renamed Logos Hill—were presented to the Clinton County Area Plan Commission. Staff reported both met many standards; motions to grant primary approval were made and seconded, but the transcript does not record final tallies on the record for both items.
At its Sept. 2 meeting the Clinton County Area Plan Commission heard staff reports on two minor subdivision petitions and record shows staff recommended primary approval for both with conditions.
The first petition (application CCDash2025-00778, docket 13-25-ST) would divide an existing property into two lots; staff described the proposed Lot 1 as roughly 6 acres containing an existing dwelling and Lot 2 as 15.66 acres for a new home. The site was described as agriculturally zoned and the drainage board unanimously approved the subdivision’s drainage on Aug. 5, staff said. The health department had approved a new lot as suitable for a septic system, and a required covenant allowing initiation of enforcement by adjacent landowners within a quarter mile was included.
Staff noted the proposed subdivision name was changed to Logos Hill after staff discovered a prior duplication in the drainage board filing. Staff recommended primary approval because the application met applicable subdivision standards (staff described the relevant state law standard that compliant subdivisions must be approved and noncompliant ones denied).
A representative who identified himself as Johnson, with 40 Federalist of Tipton, said he represented the petitioner and offered no substantive changes to the staff report.
For the second petition (application CCDash2025-00781, docket 14-25-SD), staff described a two‑lot split with Lot 1 at about 11.53 acres (vacant except for a barn) and Lot 2 at 7.84 acres with an existing dwelling. Staff explained the county’s administrative point system for two‑lot subdivisions—applications scoring fewer than 10 points proceed to the plan commission for review. This second petition scored below the administrative threshold and thus required the commission’s consideration; staff recommended primary approval.
Commission members asked for roll‑call votes during both items. The transcript records motions and seconds for primary approval on the first item and a motion and second on the second item; however, the meeting record supplied here does not include the explicit final roll‑call tallies or a clear statement of final approval for each petition. The staff report and the board’s motions are in the meeting record and, if required, will be part of the county’s official minutes.
Ending: Staff presented both minor subdivision petitions with recommended primary approvals and the commission discussed them and called for votes; the transcript provided does not contain clear final tallies for those two actions.
