Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environment Watershed topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident raises septic, watershed and rural-character concerns for proposed Chickahominy Summerplace
Summary
A Powhatan District resident told the planning commission that the Chickahominy Summerplace proposal may conflict with the county's Engage 2045 plan on soils, septic suitability, watershed biodiversity and rural-road character; the comment did not prompt action at the Sept. 3 meeting.
Andrew Huckaby, a Powhatan District resident, addressed the Planning Commission during the Sept. 3 public-comment period to say he believes the proposed Chickahominy Summerplace subdivision may be inconsistent with the county's Engage 2045 comprehensive plan in several respects.
Huckaby said he reviewed plan pages he identified by number and raised concerns that the proposed development would be placed on soils "pretty unfavorable for on-site septic systems," that the Yarmouth Creek watershed "is pretty biodiverse," and that the county's plan discourages suburban-style development to the west of Centerville Road and calls for preserving mature tree canopies on rural roads such as Jollypond Road. He identified the affected parcels as 1613 and 1685 Jollypond Road and offered copies of his notes to the planning staff.
Why this matters: Those comments were made during the meeting's public-comment period and do not represent a staff analysis or a formal application review. The concerns cite Engage 2045 text the commenter said bears on soils, watershed biodiversity and rural-road character; any regulatory determination would depend on staff review, site-specific studies and any formal application filings.
Record and next steps Huckaby spoke during the general public-comment period and no motion or formal action followed. Staff and the commission did not make elaborated findings in response during the meeting; if an application for Chickahominy Summerplace is filed or is under review, staff would evaluate soils, septic suitability, watershed impacts and consistency with Engage 2045 as part of the formal review process.
Quotation from the meeting "It states that the soil is pretty unfavorable for on-site septic systems," Huckaby said, referring to the Engage 2045 document. He also noted the plan language he cited calling for discouraging suburban-style development west of Centerville Road and for protecting rural road tree canopies.
Notes: This item was public comment and not a public hearing on the matter; no commission action occurred on the points raised at this meeting.
