Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Waste Fees topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bonner County commissioners consider changes to $194 annual waste fee and sticker policy

5774727 · September 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners discussed the $194 annual residential solid waste fee, sticker distribution and limits, and potential program changes including charging fees at building permit issuance; staff will return with cost data and a proposed fee schedule for a hearing.

Bonner County commissioners and solid waste staff on Oct. 5 discussed possible changes to the county’s $194 annual residential solid-waste fee, the rules for sticker distribution, and limits on extra stickers amid concerns that out-of-county and commercial users are increasing system costs.

The discussion matters because commissioners said misuse of sticker privileges and out-of-county dumping shift costs onto local residents who pay the flat residential fee.

Melissa Galt, operations manager, described current practice: properties with a home-assessed value are charged a $194 annual solid waste fee; residential customers without a home assessment may either pay the annual fee or pay at the gate ($5 for the first 3 yards, $20 per additional yard). Galt said the office mails two stickers to each assessed home; extra stickers are available with proof of residency and currently cost $5 each. Galt said the department keeps a log of undeliverable mail and records every sticker sold.

Commissioners pressed staff on whether to continue allowing extra stickers and on how to handle lost-in-mail or vehicle-accident situations. Commissioners expressed support for tightening the extra-sticker policy: multiple commissioners favored eliminating extra stickers or allowing only one replacement under stricter verification and at a higher fee (suggested $20) or requiring purchase of a full annual fee ($194) for additional coverage. One commissioner recommended a four-week window for clients to request a replacement sticker after mailing.

The board also discussed a previously raised administrative change: charging the solid waste fee at time of building-location permit issuance so new-build owners receive sticker coverage up front. Staff said legal counsel indicated that would be an “easy ordinance change”; commissioners discussed prorating on existing July 1 practice for partial-year ownership.

No fee changes were adopted at the workshop. Commissioners directed staff to provide requested cost breakdowns, usage data and a proposed fee schedule; staff will schedule another workshop and prepare a public hearing on any fee amendments. The department also said it must order sticker stock soon to meet mailing timelines for January distribution, which may require a special meeting if staff cannot complete analysis in time.

Commissioners asked staff to return with clearer definitions of “household” versus non-household materials, more precise tracking on sticker usage, and recommendations for exception documentation (lost mail, vehicle accidents) to prevent abuse.