Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Truancy School Attendance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Minnesota video explains truancy rules, thresholds and possible juvenile-court consequences
Summary
An instructional video outlines Minnesota attendance law for students ages 7–17, the absence thresholds that can trigger county intervention and juvenile-court petitions, and the range of sanctions a judge may impose if attendance does not improve.
A prerecorded informational video advised Minnesota students and their parents that state law requires children ages 7 to 17 to attend every class period each school day and explained how repeated unexcused absences can lead to county intervention and juvenile-court action. The video said students who have missed at least one class period on five separate school days are receiving the material and that a student who misses one or more class periods on seven separate school days may be petitioned to juvenile court.
The video said the immediate next step after unexcused absences is county review: if attendance improves, the county file will close; if it does not, a truancy petition in juvenile court can follow. "If admitted, the court will order a disposition," the presenter said, and described several possible court-ordered measures that the judge may impose to correct attendance, including mandatory school attendance with no unexcused absences, assessments, required doctor or therapy appointments, restrictions on use of phones or other electronics, electronic home monitoring (described in the video as allowing leaving only for school or approved appointments), random urinalysis testing and limits on driving privileges until the student turns 18.
The video said juvenile-court proceedings begin with an admit-deny hearing at which the student and parents must attend; the judge, an assistant county attorney and a truancy agent also are present. If the petition is denied, the video said, a trial is scheduled; if the petition is admitted, the court issues a disposition and schedules review hearings to monitor compliance. The presenter said that if less serious interventions fail, the court may transfer legal custody of a truant student to Stearns County Human Services for placement outside the home and may order short-term residential chemical-dependency treatment if chemical use is a factor; the video added that parents may be required to pay associated fees.
The presenter described common causes of absenteeism — including mental-health issues, bullying, problems at home such as instability, neglect or abuse, substance use and transportation problems — and urged viewers to contact school staff, a school resource officer or another responsible adult for help. The video distinguished between excused and unexcused absences, saying that parents or guardians must promptly inform the school's attendance clerk when an absence is for a legitimate reason; otherwise, the video warned, the absence will be marked unexcused. It said examples of unacceptable excuses include oversleeping, transportation issues, helping out at home or choosing work over class.
The video cited data sources to explain consequences tied to chronic absence: it referenced the Digest of Education Statistics, giving figures in the video for lifetime-earnings gaps between high-school dropouts and graduates (video figures cited roughly $400,150 and $1,600,000) and cited the National Dropout Prevention Center to say a high-school dropout is "three and a half times more likely to be arrested" than a high-school graduate and that 75 percent of state prison inmates are high-school dropouts. The presenter did not cite specific Minnesota statutes by chapter or section in the video.
The video concluded with a request that viewers visit the listed website, enter the student's name, the parent or guardian's name and the student's school, and confirm by selecting "yes" that they have watched and understood the information. The presenter said submitting the confirmation completes the process described in the video.
This video is informational and describes the county and juvenile-court processes that the presenter said can follow persistent unexcused absences; it does not itself file petitions or create court orders. The thresholds, possible court actions and administrative steps described in the video are those presented by the video narrator; specific procedures, fees and enforcement decisions are governed by local county practice and by court order in any individual case.
