Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Plastic Bag Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff update plastic bag ordinance; no vote taken
Summary
Charleston County sustainability staff provided an update on a draft plastic bag ordinance, saying it will be reviewed by the county's environmental management committee before any council action. A conservation advocate praised the effort during public comment and offered research and resources.
Charleston County sustainability staff provided an update on a draft plastic bag ordinance during the committee meeting and said the draft will be taken to the county's Environmental Management Committee before it returns to the county council for further consideration. The staff member said, "we are hoping to go to their committee meeting as well, get their opinion on it before any further movements." No formal vote on the ordinance occurred at the meeting.
The update noted the draft ordinance was included in the meeting packet and has been circulated to committee members earlier. Committee members discussed the ordinance's goal of aligning the county with other municipalities to avoid being an outlier, and asked staff questions about outreach; one member said the objective was "to match up, look at the other municipality and make sure we're not the outlier." The committee did not adopt or amend the draft at this meeting.
During the public-comment period, Brooke Foster, identified as representing Coastal Conservation, thanked the county for advancing work to close a plastic-bag loophole and offered research and municipal examples for the committee to use. Foster said the city's ordinance produced a measurable decline in small plastic bags but an increase in thicker plastic bags and urged closing that loophole to reduce litter. She offered to share scientific information and resources with staff and committee members.
Discussion at the meeting focused on next steps rather than policy specifics: staff will present the draft to the Environmental Management Committee for feedback and the ordinance will ultimately be scheduled for council consideration. Committee members and the public urged continued outreach and evidence-based materials, and a public commenter volunteered scientific and municipal examples to help shape the ordinance.
No formal motion to adopt the ordinance was made at the meeting; the committee recorded only an informational update and directed staff to pursue the committee review and subsequent council scheduling.
