Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation Fees topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council discusses $40 nonresident fee for Alpharetta adult activity programs; staff says fee would be reviewed after 12 months

5774498 · August 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff proposed a $40 rolling 12‑month nonresident membership fee for people who use the Adult Activity Center and some Preston Ridge programs; council asked for more details and staff noted a sliding-scale option for low-income participants.

City staff proposed a $40 annual nonresident fee Wednesday for people who use the city’s Adult Activity Center programs, citing a high share of out-of-city participants and the cost to Alpharetta taxpayers. Morgan (Adult Activity Center staff) told council about program usage and recommended a $40 rolling 12‑month fee for nonresidents taking part in year-round free or fee-based classes. Staff said about 60% of participants are nonresidents and roughly half of those come from Forsyth County; the $40 fee would apply in addition to any per-class charges where applicable. Morgan said the fee would be applied on a 12‑month rolling basis (join in April, valid through the next April) and staff would evaluate the program after 12 months. Council members raised questions. Councilman DeRito said many participants are seniors on fixed incomes and urged the city to remain welcoming; Morgan responded that the city offers income-based fee waivers or sliding-scale assistance for qualifying residents and would apply similar options for nonresidents if needed. Director DeMorton (presenting staff) estimated the fee could generate about $8,000–$10,000 in fiscal year 2026 and said staff would monitor participation and fiscal impact. No vote was taken; the item was discussed as a work-session-level policy matter. Council asked staff to return with data tracking use by residency, projected revenues, and an equity analysis to ensure seniors on low incomes are not excluded.