Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Alternative Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
School board approves staff recommendation on elementary restore program after extended discussion
Summary
After extended public discussion and questions about enrollment, costs and student transition, the board approved staff’s recommended change to the Elementary Restore program and directed staff to manage student transitions and reallocate grant funds if needed.
The LCS School Board voted to approve staff’s recommendation regarding the elementary Restore program following a lengthy discussion about student placement, costs and how grant funds would be handled.
Board members raised concerns about day‑one timing, teacher transitions and the academic outcomes of students who return from alternative placements. A board member who disclosed a personal interest in a human-resources item also asked to pull the elementary Restore item from consent for discussion; after questions and staff explanations the board voted to approve the recommended action.
Nut graf: The board approved the change while directing staff to plan transitions for students and staff, to seek VDOE approval as needed for grant amendments, and to ensure supports for reentry so students do not lose instructional time.
Division staff explained that elementary Restore is a tiered program serving a small number of students: staff said the program served approximately 16 students over the previous school year and typically had no more than about five students at a time. Staff said positions in elementary Restore were grant-funded and that staff were made aware of the temporary nature of those assignments when they accepted them. The division’s grants team described the process for amending VDOE grants and said grant funds could be reallocated to support secondary Restore or other eligible activities; staff said they had notified VDOE of possible reallocation and expect the amendment and monitoring process to proceed.
Board members and staff discussed possible student transitions: staff described using TAP (a separate tiered program) to absorb students where capacity exists and potentially adding classrooms to TAP based on grade-level need. Staff said they would develop individualized transition plans that could include partial days, visits by base-school teachers or counselors, visual supports and behavior plans.
Concerns raised included the per‑student cost of the program, the ratio of staff to students and whether students who return to base schools see academic declines. A board member asked about a reported per‑student figure of about $120,000; staff attributed cost drivers to behavioral specialists and related staffing and benefits. Staff emphasized that the goal is to maintain support without disrupting classrooms and that many grant-funded employees could be reassigned to other programs or positions in the division as vacancies occur.
After further questions and assurances about transition planning, a board member moved to approve staff’s recommendation for the elementary Restore item and the motion passed by roll call vote.
