Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Appointments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council confirms appointments to Board of Appeals and Cable Commission

5772259 · August 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Peabody City Council unanimously approved two mayoral appointments: Peter Bakula as an alternate on the Board of Appeals and Charlie Manoli to the Cable Commission, with both appointees speaking briefly at the meeting.

The Peabody City Council on Aug. 19 unanimously approved two mayoral appointments: Peter Bakula to an alternate seat on the Board of Appeals and Charlie Manoli to the Cable Commission.

The appointments were presented during council consideration of Item 7c. Peter Bakula introduced himself at the podium and said he is a lifelong resident, lives at 278 Newbury Street, Lot 51, and serves as a library trustee and a member of the rent control board. Councilor Gamache moved approval of Bakula’s appointment to the Board of Appeals with a term to expire Dec. 31, 2028. The roll-call vote was recorded as 11–0 in favor.

The council then considered Charlie Manoli for a two-year term on the Cable Commission, ending Dec. 30, 2026. Councilor Cherco moved the appointment. Manoli told the council he has “30 plus years” in telecommunications, has worked with education and government contracts, and is familiar with contract negotiation and E-rate processes. The council approved his appointment by roll call, 11–0.

Why it matters: Both appointments fill volunteer positions that advise the city on appeals and cable/telecommunications matters; the council’s unanimous votes indicate council support for the nominees’ qualifications.

Bakula and Manoli offered brief remarks focused on experience and willingness to serve. Councilors who spoke during the appointment segment praised both nominees for public service and community involvement.

Motion records: The council recorded motions and roll-call votes for each appointment; both motions carried 11–0.

The council did not take additional formal actions related to either appointment at the meeting.