Ward 5 candidates emphasize multiple outreach channels, regular precinct meetings

At an LCTV Ward 5 candidate forum, three candidates said improving communication and accessibility for residents would be a top focus if elected. The candidates proposed regular precinct meetings, multilingual communication and a mix of digital and non-digital outreach to reach Ward 5's diverse population.

Why it matters: Ward 5 candidates said poor advance notice about city actions and uneven access to information leave many residents unaware of projects that affect them. Candidates linked better communication to stronger community participation and accountability.

All three attendees described rotating, neighborhood-level meetings as a priority. Josh Polonsky, a candidate and president of the Pine Hill Civic Association, said, “If the residents you're working on behalf of can't get in touch with you and can't be access and you can't be accessible to them, especially as a ward counselor, you'll be completely ineffective.” He recommended meeting regularly across precincts and using in-person outreach to reach residents without internet access. Liliana Patino, a candidate and senior director of community impact and development at Elliot Community Services, said her experience as a clinician helps her connect with families and listen to residents’ needs: “For me, connections is something that I value.” Kataliz “Cardi” Paez said the ward’s diversity requires multiple communication strategies and suggested using community spaces and arts programming to build awareness and trust.

Candidates recommended layered outreach: rotating neighborhood meetings, quarterly citywide gatherings, translated materials and posted notices at local businesses and service providers. Polonsky and Patino both stressed accountability: Polonsky asked residents to contact him about decisions they disagree with so he can be held accountable; Patino tied communication to follow-through from agencies that serve people experiencing housing instability.

The candidates also proposed practical measures to increase transparency: consistent newsletters or postings about construction and street closures, repeated reminders about meeting dates and multilingual materials. Cardi suggested using technology — including transcription and note keeping tools — so residents who cannot attend can read summaries and follow up.

Taken together, the proposals echo repeated forum complaints that residents often learn of changes after decisions are made. The candidates offered similar remedies, centering regular, accessible neighborhood outreach and language access.

The forum did not produce a formal plan or vote; candidates described priorities and approaches they would pursue if elected.