Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utility Rates Avista topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Talent council sends letter to Public Utility Commission opposing Avista 7% proposed gas rate increase
Summary
Council approved a mayor-signed letter to the Oregon Public Utility Commission raising concerns about Avista Natural Gas’ proposed 7% rate increase and urging consideration of public-safety-only infrastructure work and electrification incentives to reduce reliance on fossil fuels.
Get email alerts on the Utility Rates Avista topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Talent City Council voted unanimously on Feb. 5 to approve a letter, to be signed by the mayor on behalf of the council, to the Oregon Public Utility Commission regarding Avista Natural Gas’ proposed rate revision (UG-519 as referenced in the staff report).
Councilor Panamoroff read the letter into the record as amended to note it would come from the mayor on behalf of the governing body. The letter says the proposed 7% increase would place an “undue burden on Talent's residents,” with the greatest impact on low-income households during winter months. The letter urges the commission to “support only the necessary infrastructure improvements for public safety without placing an undue burden on ratepayers and the climate” and asks the commission to consider strategies that reduce reliance on gas infrastructure, citing alignment with the city's comprehensive plan clean-energy element and a recent council clean-energy resolution.
Councilor Panamoroff also noted the Citizens Utility Board’s proposal that instead of extensive pipe replacement homeowners might be offered incentives to convert to electric service, a concept she described as “one of the smarter and more efficient ways to make this happen.” The staff report and council discussion referenced average-bill estimates included in the letter: an average residential increase of $4.27 per month, single-family averages cited at about $69 per month (with higher winter amounts), and multifamily averages noted in the letter; those figures appear in the letter as presented to the council.
Councilor Panamoroff moved to approve the letter from the city to the Public Utility Commission; the motion was seconded and passed unanimously. The council directed that the mayor sign and transmit the letter on the city’s behalf.
The letter was presented as a policy comment to the commission; the council did not adopt an ordinance or resolution on the matter during the Feb. 5 meeting.

