Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Plat Approval Sandy Springs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission holds Sandy Springs Division 5 plat after resident flooding, grading and easement concerns
Summary
The commission deferred final action on the Sandy Springs Division 5 plat after residents submitted late emails alleging backyard flooding and staff said easement and grading issues remain; legal and engineering review were requested before the next meeting.
The Lorain Planning Commission on Friday voted to hold the Sandy Springs Division 5 plat application until staff and legal review outstanding grading and easement matters raised by residents and staff are resolved.
Tom Lester, representing Sandy Springs Development LLC, said most engineering revisions had been made but the developer would grant an access and maintenance easement to the Deerfield Homeowners Association on the final plat. Lester said some punch-list items remain, including wetland signage and grading work that must meet plan specifications.
Planning staff read emails from residents raising concerns about flooding tied to wetlands and construction activity. An email from Eve Alberti, read into the record, said in part: "I would like to add these comments and dates to my previous statement. I invite you to object to the start of the final phase of the Sandy Springs development. ... I have experienced flooding on my property... This area has deteriorated due to many factors, including initial grading, construction vehicles being driven into and around the wetlands, and overflows from nearby ponds." Another email from Michelle Jenkins raised similar flooding concerns and said council members had been contacted.
Engineering staff told the commission the subdivision is "approximately 95% complete" but cited a dozen outstanding items, with grading and a touch-up that "didn't meet plan specs" as the largest concern. Legal staff had not yet reviewed the proposed easement, and planning staff recommended that engineering and the law department review the updated plat and any easement language before the commission acts.
Why it matters: Residents told the commission they continue to experience flooding and want the developer and city to resolve site deficiencies before final-phase construction proceeds. Planning staff said the planning commission's approval is only the first step; final plat approval requires council action after completion of required improvements and a city punch list.
Details: The commission voted to hold the plat for further review; the motion passed by voice vote. The transcript records that staff received resident emails "too late" to be added to the public application and that legal had not yet seen the easement agreement. City staff also noted wetlands that cannot be impacted because of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers restrictions; the developer acknowledged those constraints.
Next steps: The commission asked that engineering and the law department review the easement agreement and outstanding grading issues and bring the matter back when those items are resolved.
