Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Epa Grant Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee halts vote on EPA grant contracts after recusal, cites MassDEP language confusion
Summary
A planned committee vote on four-year multipurpose grant contracts with two environmental consultants, including local firm Credair Associates LLC, did not proceed after a committee member recused due to an apparent state-regulation conflict; staff were advised to place the matter on the full council agenda if they wish to proceed.
The committee did not take action on two proposed four-year contracts funded by a federal Environmental Protection Agency multipurpose grant after a required recusal created a lack of quorum.
Planning Director Daniel McCarthy explained the grant is for roughly $1 million and requires the city to retain two Qualified Environmental Professionals for work over a four-year grant period. He said the procurement selected one smaller, local firm (Credair Associates LLC) and one larger national firm to cover a range of planned work.
During the presentation a committee member disclosed a conflict stemming from an employment relationship with a state agency and recused from discussion and voting. The recusal followed a committee exchange about possible MassDEP (Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection) regulatory references in the contract scope and a citation to 310 CMR 40 (state cleanup/contingency regulations). The recused member said they could not participate because of that potential connection.
Because the recusal removed the quorum for a committee vote, the committee chair instructed staff that the item could be placed on the full-council agenda under old business if the administration wants to advance the contracts without committee action.
Why it matters: the grant funds environmental work across multiple city projects, and the contracts would place two consultants on a retainer for tasks that could arise during the four-year grant period. The recusal and resulting lack of action mean the city cannot award the contract at the committee level tonight.
Clarifying details from staff: the contracts are retainer-style (agencies paid for work performed); Credair was selected as the local firm and has prior experience in the Merrimack Valley Planning Commission area; the grant requires two qualified professionals and covers a multi-year scope of work.
Next steps: planning staff may request full-council consideration under old business; the chair advised city clerk guidance on adding the item to the full-council agenda.
