Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Blerney County SD No. 2 reviews student-medication and concealed-firearms policies at first reading
Summary
At a Sept. 3 Committee of the Whole meeting, trustees reviewed a redlined student-medication policy (JLCD) and a concealed-firearms policy (CKA) on first reading; staff, nurses and law enforcement advised changes and the board set final consideration for the Sept. 8 regular meeting.
Get email alerts on the School Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a Sept. 3 work session, the Blerney County School District No. 2 Committee of the Whole reviewed proposed revisions to the district's student-medication policy (JLCD) and a concealed-firearms policy (CKA) on first reading, with staff and law enforcement recommending wording changes and district nurses expected to attend the Sept. 8 board meeting to answer questions.
The proposed JLCD redline consolidates edits produced by the district's two nurses over the past one to two years, staff said. Trustees were asked to review the redline before the Monday regular meeting so nurses can explain edits and the board can act if it chooses.
The board also discussed CKA, the concealed-firearms policy, which has generated three public comments so far (two written, one submitted online). Board members were told law enforcement recommended replacing the term "imminent" with "immediate" in a key paragraph; staff characterized that wording as being "in line with" officers' practice. The board was asked to come prepared Sept. 8 to choose between the two words.
District legal/process guidance at the meeting stressed two procedural paths for policy changes. A staff member explained that when a statute, rule or procedure triggers a formal rule-making requirement, the district must follow a 45-day rule-making process with public notice; by contrast, staff recommended the ordinary two-reading path for these policies because the revisions are statements of policy rather than new narrow rules. The presenter said if no changes appear between first and second reading, the second reading could be final; if changes occur, the board may choose a third reading.
Separately, staff noted a short purchasing-procedure manual update that corrects references to a federal regulation and broadens language to cover all federal programs rather than a single program; staff characterized that update as a procedural change for board information rather than a policy action unless trustees prefer to vote.
The board scheduled the policies for public comment at the Sept. 8 regular meeting at 7 p.m. at Carpenter; nurses and law-enforcement representatives were expected to be available to answer trustee questions.

