Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Texas Supreme Court hears whether DFPS ‘abandoned’ bid to terminate mother’s parental rights
Summary
At oral argument in case no. 240840D, attorneys debated whether testimony by a Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) caseworker that the department was not seeking termination of a mother’s parental rights amounted to an abandonment of the termination claim, and whether a caseworker can bind the State on that question.
The Supreme Court of Texas heard argument in case number 240840D over whether the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services abandoned its cause of action to terminate a respondent mother’s parental rights after a DFPS caseworker testified at trial that the department was not seeking termination.
At the hearing, Mister Rowans, counsel for the petitioner, told the court: “The issue this morning in this case is whether or not the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services abandoned its cause of action to terminate respondent mother's parental rights.” Rowans argued that the department’s designated representative testified it was not seeking termination and that courts of appeals have treated similar testimony as abandonment in multiple recent decisions.
The question matters because abandonment can remove the legal basis for a termination judgment even when termination appears in the department’s written pleadings. Rowans asked…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

