Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Street Sidewalk Closure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates clearer rules for sidewalk and lane closures amid Lockspur project delays
Summary
Council members discussed proposed updates to the city's street-and-sidewalk closure code (Title 9) to require permits, clarify 'temporary' vs. 'extended' closures and ensure pedestrian detours; debate focused on enforcement teeth and avoiding undue burdens on short-duration work.
Athens City Council reviewed proposed changes to the city code that would update rules for sidewalk and temporary lane closures, including permit requirements, signage and fees.
Councilmember Amber Cloudfelter and Director Stone led a discussion about distinguishing brief, short‑duration closures from extended closures that prohibit pedestrian passage. Director Stone said the administration interprets “temporary closure” broadly but will require full signage and a pedestrian detour when pedestrians cannot pass the work zone: “A temporary closure is any type of closure of the street sidewalk or alley for any duration of time... An extended period of time is when the work would prevent a pedestrian from traversing through the area at all for the duration. At that point, they would need to have signage and a barricade and follow the MUTCD for setting up a pedestrian detour.”
Council members linked the ordinance to experience with the Lockspur (Lostro) project, which has had multiple extensions of closure. Director Stone said the intent is to give the city “more teeth” to charge for extended or repeated closures while avoiding overly burdensome requirements for brief tasks such as window washing or short equipment unloads.
Council discussed whether the ordinance should use the term “closure” rather than “temporary closure” to avoid confusion. Some members favored leaving “temporary” in place to make clear the rule applies to non-permanent (construction) closures rather than permanent changes to right-of-way, while others asked for clearer language so the requirement to provide an alternate passageway is unambiguous for extended closures.
No final vote was taken; council members asked the administration to return with clarified draft language at the next meeting. Staff said they can produce suggested wording and that the city can require a permit and fees for closures of all durations, with heightened requirements where an alternate pedestrian path must be provided.
