Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance And Legislation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves grant, legal spending and multiple invoice payments; budget sent to second reading
Summary
Lorain City Council voted to accept a NOPEC grant, authorize additional legal spending in a class-action matter, approve several emergency "then-and-now" invoice payments and other ordinances; the city's annual appropriation ordinance was moved to a second reading after three dissenting votes.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance And Legislation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lorain City Council on the evening'approved a set of ordinances and emergency payments, including acceptance of a Northeast Ohio Public Energy Council (NOPEC) energized community grant and authorization of additional funds for outside counsel in an ongoing class-action matter. Council also approved multiple "then-and-now" invoice payments under Ohio Revised Code Section 5705.41 and passed a resolution supporting the federal tax exemption for municipal bonds. The proposed 2025 appropriation ordinance was not adopted and was referred for a second reading after recorded dissent.
The most immediate action was an ordinance authorizing acceptance of a 2025 NOPEC energized community grant; the ordinance was introduced by Mr. Thornsberry, the rules were suspended, and the measure passed unanimously. Council also approved an emergency ordinance authorizing additional expenditures for class-action legal services provided by the law firm identified in the agenda; Council was told class counsel has billed the city approximately $170,000 to date, and the ordinance passed unanimously after suspension of the three-reading rule.
Council approved several payments invoking the then-and-now certification exception in Ohio Revised Code Section 5705.41 for invoices submitted by the police and utilities departments. One utilities payment was amended on the floor after a council member pointed out a typographical error: the figure shown in the ordinance was changed from $204,407 to $8,568 and the amended ordinance passed unanimously.
Other business in the legislative block included: - A resolution declaring support for preservation of the federal tax exemption of municipal bonds (introduced by Mr. Nutt and passed unanimously). - An ordinance creating 911.202 payment plans, which was moved to a second reading. - An ordinance amending section 911.524 (meter service charge) passed on third reading with two recorded dissenting votes from Council members Pringalski and Arroyo.
The ordinance appropriating money for city operations for the 2025 fiscal year (the annual appropriation/temporary-to-permanent budget item) was not adopted at first reading: efforts to suspend the rules failed, and the item was advanced to a second reading after three dissenting votes (Council members Duvall, Arroyo and Blansbury voted no on suspending the rules). Council members and staff said the appropriation will return for further review at the next meeting.
Votes at a glance (items announced on the agenda and recorded on the transcript): - Resolution supporting municipal bonds exemption (Passed unanimously). - NOPEC energized community grant acceptance (Ordinance; Passed unanimously). - Ordinance to accept additional legal services funds (emergency; Passed unanimously). Class counsel charges to date reported ~"$170,000." (Staff comment.) - Then-and-now invoice payments for Police (Ordinance; emergency; Passed unanimously). - Then-and-now invoice payments for Utilities (Ordinance; emergency; Amended on floor from $204,407 to $8,568; Passed unanimously as amended). - Ordinance creating 911.202 payment plans (Referred to second reading). - Annual appropriation ordinance (Item h) (Rule to suspend failed; moved to second reading; 3 dissenting votes recorded). - Amendment to 911.524 (meter service charge) (Passed on third reading; 2 dissenting votes recorded: Pringalski, Arroyo).
Council president and members frequently used the rules-suspension procedure to move items in a single meeting; suspension was successful for several items but failed for the annual appropriation ordinance, which prompted the second-reading referral. No ordinance in the legislative block failed final passage outright at this meeting.
Ending: The council completed the legislative block and moved on to committee reports and public comment; the appropriation ordinance will return for further consideration on second reading with additional review by administration and auditors.
