Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation Plain City 2200 North topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Weber County moves to begin annexation notices for three Plain City islands tied to 2200 North project
Summary
Weber County staff requested authorization Aug. 25 to publish notices and place a resolution on an upcoming agenda to begin annexation proceedings for three unincorporated areas requested by Plain City, a step staff said is needed to finish work on 2200 North.
Get email alerts on the Annexation Plain City 2200 North topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Weber County staff asked the Board of Commissioners on Aug. 25 to authorize public notice and placement of a resolution to begin annexation proceedings for three unincorporated islands requested by Plain City, a step county staff said would clear the path for completing the 2200 North roadway project. Cortland Erickson, a county staff member, presented maps showing three sections Plain City proposes to annex. Erickson said the proposed annexation “does not include JDC Ranch” and that the parcels are largely developed. He described the action as following the county’s prior process with neighboring cities: the county would adopt findings and hold its public hearing, then Plain City would hold its own hearing to accept the annexation. Why it matters: County staff said securing annexation was requested by Plain City to ensure the city will accept responsibility for completing 2200 North improvements. Commissioners and staff discussed one remaining private owner, referenced in the record as Bridal Moulding, who owns land that extends into the planned right-of-way and has not signed purchase agreements for the roadway centerline. Staff said the annexation would transfer long-term responsibility for the road to Plain City but might not immediately resolve every private property interest. What was discussed: Staff said Plain City officials, including Mayor Beasley, had indicated preliminary support; staff cautioned they could not guarantee the city council’s final vote. Erickson said the county could advertise and hold its public hearing within weeks and have county action by mid-September, allowing Plain City time to complete its process before year end. Commissioners discussed eminent domain as a fallback for holdouts but noted an alternative legislative approach: Representative Doug has opened a bill file to address county-level annexation authority under state code, which staff said could allow certain counties of the first class to include annexations without protest under state law and thereby avoid eminent domain. Clarifications and next steps: Staff asked for authorization to proceed with notice and to place a resolution on a commission agenda. Commissioners agreed and encouraged staff to move the timeline forward while Mayor Beasley and a supportive council member were in office. Staff noted the annexation map includes parcels held by Nielsen Homes and a small parcel owned by Rocky Mountain Power; the map excludes JDC Ranch. Staff said if the annexation proceeds and Plain City accepts it, the city would assume responsibility for the roadway segments; some private property boundary clean‑up may still be required before final construction.

