Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Spring Haven Major Dev Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission recommends Spring Haven major development plan: 392 single‑family lots, multiuse path and open space

5765785 · August 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission recommended approval of the Spring Haven major development plan (Chandler Hills area) for 392 single‑family lots on about 117 acres, including a 12‑foot multiuse path along Kelly Park Road, multiple open‑space amenities and dry‑pond stormwater design; commissioners asked for clarification on setbacks and pond design.

The Planning and Zoning Commission on Aug. 12 recommended approval of the Spring Haven major development plan for Chandler Hills, a proposed 392‑lot single‑family subdivision on about 117.16 acres.

Planning manager Bobby Howe told commissioners the density would be about 3.38 dwelling units per acre (the neighborhood character zone permits up to 5 units per acre) and that the master plan previously was approved by the City Council on Feb. 19, 2025. The plan includes front‑loaded and rear‑loaded lots with widths ranging from about 34 to 60 feet, 32.59% open space (the code requires 20%), internal trails and pocket parks, and dedication of right‑of‑way strips for future Chandler Road and for a 12‑foot multiuse path along Kelly Park Road.

During discussion, commissioners asked clarifying questions about building setbacks (staff clarified setbacks are measured from back of curb to dwelling) and stormwater design; applicant engineers confirmed the ponds are designed as dry ponds meeting the 72‑hour recovery requirement and that approved stormwater systems will be constructed to meet city and state standards. Commissioners also asked about potential mosquito concerns near the adjacent school; the applicant said the dry‑pond design is intended not to be a persistent wet pond and therefore does not provide conditions for stable mosquito breeding.

Commissioner Norwood moved to recommend approval and Commissioner Washington seconded; the motion carried on a voice vote. The recommendation advances to City Council and later site and permit reviews.