Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
St. Charles opens public hearing on First Street TIF Amendment No. 3; residents urge transparency and redevelopment of park‑district parcel
Summary
At a Sept. 2 public hearing, St. Charles city officials accepted public comment on Amendment No. 3 to the First Street TIF district; speakers asked about outstanding bond debt, TIF revenues and urged the park district to develop a neglected parcel between Sammy’s and Jalapeño Grill.
The St. Charles City Council convened a public hearing Tuesday to consider Amendment No. 3 to the First Street Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district and took public comment from residents who raised questions about bond debt, annual TIF revenue and the condition of a parcel owned by the park district. Mayor Clint Hall opened the hearing and noted that legal notice had been published in the Daily Herald on Aug. 6 and Aug. 19. The council then invited public comment; no written comments had been filed with the clerk’s office or economic development staff before the hearing, the mayor said. Bob Rasmussen, a resident of the TIF district, said in public comment that he received a letter referencing the TIF’s bonds and asked where the district stands on its outstanding bond balance and annual revenue. “I’m just curious, where we stand on the TIF with the bonds,” Rasmussen said, noting he lives in the district and that initial bonds came out in 2004. Mayor Hall did not provide an on‑the‑record answer during the hearing but told Rasmussen he would be put in touch with staff member Connolly to follow up on the financial details. Another speaker, Steve Loeffler, asked the council to press the park district to develop a parcel south of Prairie and east of First Street — a gravel lot behind Sammy’s and near Discount Tire that Loeffler described as deteriorated and lacking a safe sidewalk crossing. “It’s time for you guys to develop this property,” Loeffler said, urging either development by the park district or conveyance of the parcel to nearby business owners or the city so it can be improved for parking, sidewalks or a bike path. The council voted to open and then to close the public hearing by roll call; the record shows the hearing was carried and closed with no council deliberation or formal action on the amendment during that session. The public‑hearing recordation and the mayor’s references to notice publication indicate the process is at the public‑input stage; the transcript does not record a subsequent council vote to approve or deny the amendment on Sept. 2.
Speakers quoted or referenced in this article are those who addressed the council during the TIF public hearing and are listed in the speakers section below.
