Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carpentersville trustees approve Fire Station 93 kitchen remodel after debate over bidder qualifications
Summary
The Village Board awarded a $169,900 contract to LZ Design Build Group for a Fire Station 93 kitchen remodel after trustees rejected a motion to postpone while some raised questions about the bidder's apprenticeship documentation and prior payment complaints.
Get email alerts on the Procurement Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Village of Carpentersville Board of Trustees voted to award a $169,900 contract to LZ Design Build Group of Roselle for a kitchen remodel at Fire Station 93 after an extended discussion and a failed effort to postpone the award. The matter drew sharp questions from trustees about whether LZ had met the village's bid requirements and concerns voiced about the company's labor practices. Trustee Jeffrey Abbott made the motion to award the contract; Trustee Maria Garcia seconded. After debate the board approved the award by roll call (four yes, two no). Trustee Jeffrey Malone asked why LZ was treated as a lowest responsible bidder after earlier bid irregularities. "Why were they allowed to not be disqualified if they didn't meet our ordinance?" Malone asked, noting she had called the local chapter of the Associated Builders and Contractors to verify the contractor's apprenticeship status but had not received a returned call. Assistant Director Zadlowski, Public Works, explained the technical issue: LZ was disqualified in the first solicitation for failing to submit two required addendum certifications, not solely for lacking apprenticeship documentation. Zadlowski said the firm did subsequently provide proof of enrollment in a Department of Labor-recognized apprenticeship program and other required certificates that were included in the current bid packet. Trustee Rusty Frost urged caution and pressed the board to delay the award, citing calls he said he had received about the contractor's alleged failure to pay workers. "They don't pay their people. I'm telling you. I can't prove it, but I will," Frost said, and moved to postpone; that motion failed on a voice/roll-call tally. After the postponement motion failed, the original motion to award passed. Attorney Gibson (Village Attorney) and village staff described the procedural options if the board declined the award, including rebidding. Staff warned that rebidding could result in the same bidders returning and that the prior solicitations showed only one bidder within the village's budgetary parameter. The contract award resolution also included acceptance of the bid schedule's alternate unit prices. There were no amendments noted at the time of the vote. The board did not adopt any additional conditions on the award pending further verification of employment practices. The vote tally announced by the clerk recorded Trustee Maniscalco, Trustee Abbott, Trustee Garcia and Trustee Gupta as voting yes; Trustee Frost and Trustee Malone voted no. The motion carried. Village staff said they would continue to monitor compliance with contract requirements during construction and that standard village contract remedies (withholding, stop-work rights, etc.) would apply if the contractor failed to meet obligations.

