Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Digital Replicas topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Performers, unions back bill requiring clear consent for digital replicas of voices and likenesses
Summary
SAG‑AFTRA representatives and performers urged the committee to pass H74, which would require contracts to clearly disclose digital‑replica rights and ensure informed consent and reasonable specificity for intended uses of a performer’s voice or likeness.
SAG‑AFTRA New England and performers urged the Joint Committee to report House Bill 74 favorably and to require clear, conspicuous contract language before digital replica rights are assigned.
Witnesses told the committee that current standard contracts can bury language granting perpetual or broad rights to use a performer’s voice or likeness in ways the signer does not expect. House Bill 74 would not ban transfers of digital replica rights but would require that contracts be specific about the scope, media and intended uses so performers can give informed consent.
"This bill requires contracts to clearly and conspicuously state digital replica rights and terms and to be reasonably specific in describing the intended uses of the digital replica," said Jessica Marr, executive director of SAG‑AFTRA New England. Marr told the committee the measure follows laws recently passed in California and New York and would protect performers and creative professionals who may lack bargaining leverage.
Performer Andrea Lyman testified that the legislation is about preserving livelihoods and ensuring consent. "When we enter into agreements, it must be with informed consent, ensuring that we can continue to make a living from our work," she said.
SAG‑AFTRA witnesses urged the committee to advance H74 alongside other AI‑related bills, including the FAIR Act, noting that protections for digital likenesses and worker surveillance can be complementary parts of a broader approach to AI governance.
The committee took no final action at the hearing; advocates submitted written testimony and requested continued engagement on contract language and enforcement mechanisms.
Less critical details: witnesses emphasized the need for reasonable representation and compensation protocols when performers agree to transfer digital replica rights.
