Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Former BU adjunct urges state ombudsman to handle antisemitism complaints in higher education

September 08, 2025 | 2025 Legislature MA, Massachusetts


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Former BU adjunct urges state ombudsman to handle antisemitism complaints in higher education
Douglas Hart, a former adjunct professor at Boston University, urged the Special Commission on Antisemitism to recommend that Massachusetts create a state‑level ombudsman within the attorney general’s office focused on antisemitism in higher education.

Hart described his own case: he said he was "harassed out" of Boston University in January 2025 after protesting what he described as antisemitic conduct, and that he faced a Title IX complaint that was ultimately dismissed. Hart said the complaint was "fraudulent" and that his experience left him concerned about relying solely on university adjudication when allegations involve campus offices that may be closely connected to the issues being raised.

Why it matters: Hart said some students, faculty and staff will not feel comfortable using campus reporting processes because the same campus offices (Title IX, diversity/inclusion) may have overlap with the actors involved in complaints. He recommended a state‑level mechanism that would provide an independent pathway for complaints alleging antisemitism in higher education.

Proposal details: Hart suggested an ombudsman or office within the Massachusetts attorney general’s office created by lawmakers to handle antisemitism complaints from students, faculty and staff at colleges and universities. He argued that the state already has a record of protecting civil rights and that an independent office would prevent institutions from "conducting themselves with deliberate indifference and get[ting] a free pass."

Discussion vs. decision: Commissioners discussed options for state remedies and whether such a function should be institution‑specific or broader. No formal vote was taken at the hearing; commissioners noted alternative options may include strengthening existing state or federal complaint pathways, but expressed interest in studying Hart’s recommendation further.

What’s next: Hart said he would be available to provide more details; commissioners asked staff to consider possible institutional homes and legal mechanisms for independent review of campus antisemitism complaints.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Massachusetts articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI