Bowie business owner, food-truck operators say city moved trucks without consulting them
Loading...
Summary
During public comment at the Bowie City Council meeting, a local business owner and food-truck operators said a recently passed ordinance requiring trucks to relocate to a designated food-truck area was based on incorrect information and implemented without consultation.
Dr. Pam Barlow, who operates Bowie Pet Clinic, told the Bowie City Council on April 22 that a recent city ordinance requiring food trucks to relocate to a designated food-truck area was based on false information and that she and the vendors were not consulted.
"If you do ordinances based on false information, then I don't think that ordinance can stand," Dr. Barlow said. She described allowing food trucks to use her parking lot and said she received no rent or subsidy from them: "I am not getting a dollar rent payment, subsidy, anything else for having the food trucks there." She also said her requests to meet with the mayor were unsuccessful and that the council denied her request to be on the meeting agenda.
The concern was echoed by Jeff Clancy, a food-truck operator, who said the first notice he received of the move requirement was by email. "The first that I knew about it was the email," Clancy said. He said many cities allow food trucks in commercial zones and that confining trucks to a single designated area in Bowie would reduce customer traffic for trucks and for nearby businesses. "If you put all the food trucks down in the same area, you're also gonna have conflict between the food trucks," he said, noting several currently operating trucks serve similar cuisine.
Why it matters: Dr. Barlow and Clancy said the ordinance changes how food-truck vendors can operate in Bowie and that enforcement could force trucks away from existing locations where they draw foot traffic to nearby businesses.
What the speakers asked for: Dr. Barlow asked the council to reconsider the ordinance and to consult directly with affected vendors. Clancy urged allowing food trucks to operate in appropriate commercial zones rather than limiting them to a single, city-designated lot.
No council action on the ordinance was taken at this meeting. The discussion occurred during the public-comment portion of the meeting; speakers said the ordinance had already been passed at an earlier meeting and that enforcement steps were being communicated to vendors by notice.
The transcript shows speakers raised process and outreach concerns but did not include council responses on whether the ordinance would be revisited.
Ending: City staff or council members did not announce follow-up steps on the record at the April 22 meeting. Those seeking to comment further or request reconsideration should contact the city clerk's office for information about how to request agenda placement or appeal city code enforcement actions.
