Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Signage Window Coverings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clayton planning board approves window signage and coverings at 7447 Forsyth
Summary
The Planning Commission/ARB approved a modification to sign rules allowing a ground-floor tenant at 7447 Forsyth to install window coverings and window signage covering 26.2% of the storefront windows, with staff finding minimal visual impact.
The Planning Commission/Architectural Review Board on Aug. 18 approved a request to allow window coverings and window signage on the ground-floor tenant space at 7447 Forsyth, granting a modification under section 4 2 5 1 1 0 of the sign regulations.
City planner Ryan presented the file, describing the property as a C-2–zoned site in the Forsyth Station TOD and saying the tenant proposal would cover 26.2% of the window area and "cover less window area than previous tenants" while concentrating graphics near the top and bottom of the windows. Ryan said staff find the proposal to have "a minimal visual impact" and recommended approval as submitted.
The commission heard briefly from the tenant representative, identified in the record as Mr. Cole, who told the board he had "no. I don't. I just appreciate the consideration here tonight" and confirmed the sign had not yet been installed: "No. It is not. I was seeking approval before we had Landmark Sign come out and install it for us." Commissioners who commented said they agreed with the staff analysis, called the design appropriate for the recessed storefront and said the treatment improved a previously dark corner.
On a voice vote, the board approved the staff recommendation to grant the sign modification and permit the proposed window coverings and signage as submitted.
The approval allows the tenant to proceed with the window signage under the modification pathway cited in Ryan's report; it does not change the underlying zoning for the property or create a broader amendment to the city's sign code.
The staff report and the motion, as read into the record, referenced section 4 2 5 1 1 0 as the modification pathway for sign approvals. The decision was made by voice vote; the meeting record did not include a roll-call tally. No conditions beyond the staff recommendation were recorded.
The project now proceeds to building/permit review if installation work is scheduled. The applicant confirmed they will seek installation only after receiving approval.
