Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the 528 530 Calle Corvo Status topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board upgrades 528–530 Calle Corvo to contributing, designates east/southeast facades and yard wall
Summary
After staff and applicant presentations, the board designated the main residence at 528–530 Calle Corvo as contributing, identified the east and southeast facades (including the portal) as primary, designated the yard wall as contributing (noting it is exposed CMU), and left the workshop/garage as noncontributing.
The Historic District Review Board voted on Sept. 9 to designate the main residence at 528–530 Calle Corvo as contributing to the downtown and East Side Historic District while naming primary facades for preservation review. Staff presented the site history and John Murphy’s HCPI research and recommended upgrading the main residence and the yard wall to contributing status, designating the east and southeastern facades (including the portal) as primary, and leaving the attached workshop/garage noncontributing.
Presenters and applicants discussed building elements: staff noted the yard wall and territorial‑style terracotta tile on the portal as character elements. The owner’s representatives asked the board to consider retaining noncontributing status to avoid constraints on energy efficiency upgrades, window replacement and structural work. The applicant team said some walls and windows are nonhistoric materials and some portals and windows have been altered over time.
After discussion the board moved to accept staff’s analysis with a clarification: the yard wall was designated contributing but staff and the board noted that the wall is exposed concrete masonry unit (CMU) and the contributing designation applies to its historic design and dimensions, not to the requirement that it currently be finish‑coated; the designation would not prevent the owner from stuccoing the wall in the future. The motion passed on roll call.
Why it matters: designation as contributing places more review requirements on significant elevations and the yard wall and could affect the owners’ ability to make changes without review or exceptions; conversely, leaving the workshop/garage noncontributing reduces review requirements for those elements.
Next steps: staff will update the HCPI and property record to reflect the board’s contributing and primary‑facade designations and provide guidance to the applicant on how to proceed with proposed upgrades consistent with preservation standards.
