Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the 222 Palacio Facades topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic board designates primary facades at 222 Palacio Street after staff debate
Summary
In three separate motions the Historic District Review Board on Sept. 9 approved staff-recommended contributing status with specified primary facades for the three buildings at 222 Palacio Street (Units A, B and C), with one modification to include an additional east facade for Building A.
The Historic District Review Board voted on Sept. 9 on a staff status recommendation for 222 Palacio Street (Units A, B and C) in the Westside Guadalupe Historic District, adopting primary‑facade designations for each building after public comment and discussion.
Staff recommended that the structures retain contributing historic status and that the board designate primary facades for each building so that future work affecting those facades would be subject to stricter review. After discussion, the board approved three motions — one for each building:
- Building A (also labeled as Building 2 in staff materials): the board designated the east (F2), south (F3) and west (F4) facades as primary. Member Cherry moved to include the east facade in addition to the staff recommendation of south and west; the motion passed on roll call (Member Bienvenu voted no; Members Cherry, Degnan and Mather voted yes).
- Building B (Building 3): the board adopted staff’s recommendation to maintain contributing status and to designate the original portion of the north facade and the east facade (excluding nonhistoric material) as primary. The motion passed unanimously among voting members present.
- Building C (Building 1): the board designated the west facade (F4) and a portion of the south/up-to-first‑jog area as primary, excluding nonhistoric materials; that motion also passed on roll call.
Board members noted these are sensitive, vernacular structures that have suffered alterations over time; members emphasized protecting character‑defining openings and massing while avoiding over‑designation that might unduly constrain future repairs. Public commenters including Gala Bechtel and Stephanie Benonato urged the board to limit primary designation where historic fabric has been extensively altered; staff and the board aimed to balance protection of original openings and visible massing with recognition of later changes.
Why it matters: primary‑facade designations determine which elevations receive normal historic‑district review and which may allow more flexibility for repairs and changes. The board’s decisions will guide what applicants must preserve or replace in-kind on the street‑facing elevations.
Implementation: Staff will reflect the board’s primary‑facade designations in the record for 222 Palacio Street and use those designations in evaluating any future permit applications for exterior work on Units A, B and C.
